Are old reports overwritten when a subject is screened again? Show answer Hide answer
No. Screenings and reports are point-in-time records. Re-screening creates a new record so teams can review screening history over time.
Questions about screening reports, PDF exports, audit records, evidence, timestamps, risk ratings and how results should be reviewed.
No. Screenings and reports are point-in-time records. Re-screening creates a new record so teams can review screening history over time.
No. Review decisions affect later entity-linked screenings, not already completed screening outputs. Historical reports remain point-in-time records.
Yes. Reports can be viewed in the platform and exported as PDF files for internal records, client files or review packs.
Where supported and relevant, company KYB reports can include registry-enhanced information as part of the screening and CDD workflow. Kyboa is not positioned as a replacement for official registry searches where a user only needs registry data.
No. A report presents screening results for review. A potential match must be assessed manually using the available identifiers, source information and internal compliance process.
No. Risk ratings, confidence levels and screening outcomes are handled by deterministic platform logic. AI-assisted text is used only for narrative summaries based on existing screening data.
The confidence level indicates how much useful information was available to support the screening outcome. A low-risk result with limited identifiers may still require additional review.
The risk rating indicates the level of potential concern identified during the screening workflow. It is not a final legal or onboarding decision.
Kyboa records the screening activity behind the report, including inputs, timestamps, source categories queried, returned results, processing outputs and report generation records.